Reports of printed copies of Tolkien Studies volume 8 being received have reached me from a couple of sources, though my own copies haven't yet arrived. Nor does it currently (at the time of posting) seem possible to order the new volume via the West Virginia University Press order page, alas. [UPDATE: this has finally been fixed.]
Also on the Tolkien front, Doug Kane sends news of the imminent release of the paperback of his Arda Reconstructed, which has a redesigned cover, which I post here courtesy of Doug. It looks quite nice.
Paul Edmund Thomas has passed along some further information on the forthcoming reprint of E.R. Eddison's Styrbiorn the Strong, coming from University of Minnesota Press. It will indeed have the exquisite decorations by Eddison's brother-in-law, the artist Keith Henderson. But the best news of all is that it will contain previously unpublished material intended for the book written by Eddison himself. This includes a 1000 word dedicatory epistle to his brother Colin, and a 1500 word closing note that was used only in a very brief form, edited to less than a page. Add to this Paul's Afterword and this makes for the most complete, and most desirable edition of Styrbiorn ever. One of Keith Henderson's decorations can be seen on the dust-wrapper to the original Jonathan Cape edition (right).
The dust-wrapper design of the Albert & Charles Boni edition (left) is uncredited, but Paul suggests that it is by Boris Artzybasheff, who certainly did the (also uncredited) design for the Boni edition of The Worm Ouroboros (published, like Stybiorn, in 1926).
In my previous post I observed that by 1976 the publishing practice of comparing anything to Tolkien, in order to attempt to sell it, had reached a ubiquitous level. Seeing Leonora Carrington's The Hearing Trumpet blurbed in the 1976 Pocket paperback edition as "a fantasy world that brings to mind the writings of Tolkien" set me to wondering how and when this phenomenon started. I first read Tolkien in the summer of 1973, and I recall that by the time Terry Brook's Sword of Shannara came out in April 1977, the blurb on it ("For all those who have been looking for something to read since The Lord of the Rings") was utterly meaningless. So when did this start?
The earliest occurrence I can find (on a paperback volume) is actually appropriate. It appears on the first printing (April 1967) of the Ballantine edition of The Worm Ouroboros by E.R. Eddison, where it says "an epic fantasy to compare with Tolkien's 'Lord of the Rings'." The cover is even by Barbara Remington, who did the covers for the Ballantine paperback editions of The Hobbit and the three volumes of The Lord of the Rings in 1965. Can anyone find anything earlier, or some other pre-1970 uses? Perhaps even on hardcover volumes? I will note here that I checked the cover of every volume of the Ballantine Adult Fantasy series, which ran from 1969-1974, and didn't find any such thing. Of course that was when the firm was run by Ian and Betty Ballantine---after they sold out and left in 1974, things changed. Lester del Rey and Judy-Lynn del Rey ran the fantasy and science fiction imprints, and we can thank Lester del Rey for the careers of both Terry Brooks and Stephen R. Donaldson, boths triumphs of marketing over quality.
The other question that emerges out of this is how far were publishers willing to stretch credulity (and logic) in order to compare something to Tolkien. What books got such misplaced attempts at marketing? I do not mean this question necessarily to refer to literary quality, or the lack thereof. Certainly Leonora Carrington's book is of a high quality and it seems merely publisher cynicism that they would attempt to market it so directly to the masses they perceived to all be Tolkien readers. Another case like this is Franz Werfel's Star of the Unborn (1946), which Bantam resurrected in May 1976 with the following description: "A vision as magnificent and far-reaching as Tolkien's Lord of the Rings or Frank Herbert's Dune". It is labelled "Fantasy" on the spine, and the cover has a definite fantasy feel. Again, it's of high literary quality, but of a style quite different from the high literary quality of Tolkien. Of course, in the wake of the moderate success of the Ballantine Adult Fantasy series, which revived all sorts of older books and gave them them a "fantasy" label, thus bringing about the birth of a publishing category, publishers were looking for anything they might so label as fantasy. Newcastle tried its own Forgotten Fantasy series which ran to more than a dozen books. And I'm grateful to have seen such books reprinted at that time or perhaps it might have been years before I encountered them, so there certainly are plusses to consider in the growth of the label.
The oddest of such books as I encountered is probably Astra and Flondrix (1976), by Seamus Cullen. I'll copy the front (very Boschian) and rear covers here. The blurb on the rear cover is, in itself, priceless ("an erotic Tolkien"!). (Click on any of the images to see them in a larger size.)
I just ordered TS 8 through the WVU Press order page (I think). So hopefully it is working now.
ReplyDeleteThanks for note on the paperback of Arda Reconstructed. The Amazon link seems to be broken, so I thought I would add that here: http://www.amazon.com/Arda-Reconstructed-Creation-Published-Silmarillion/dp/1611460891/ref=tmm_pap_title_0
But for those looking for the best possible deal, the Book Depository has it for 25% off ($24.71) and free worldwide delivery: http://www.bookdepository.com/Arda-Reconstructed-Douglas-Charles-Kane/9781611460896
Thanks, Doug. I think I got the Amazon link corrected, but I still don't see any means to order TS8 at the WVUP website. All of the other volumes (save TS6 which is OP), yes. I'll post an update when I'm certain the order function is working for it. Congrats on the paperback!
ReplyDeleteThanks for fixing the Amazon link! The TS8 order page at the WVUP website seems to be working for me, but maybe I'm confused.
ReplyDeleteThree books published before 1970 certainly included marketing allusions to Tolkien and I'm pretty sure about a fourth.
ReplyDelete1.Lancer's first paperback of the Cimmerian, Conan the Adventurer, promised "adventures more imaginative than 'Lord of the Rings.'" This book came out in 1966.
2.Ace's paperback of Alan Garner's The Weirdstone of Brisingamen (G-570) featured the same style of title lettering and the same cover artist (Jack Gaughan) as its paperbacks of the three volumes of The Lord of the Rings. The Ace Weirdstone was first printed in the same year as its Tolkiens, 1965. The cover copy promises a "fantastic novel in the Tolkien tradition." I bought mine in 1969 or so, and I assume the cover copy was the same in 1965.
3.Using the same title lettering again, Ace reprinted Garner's The Moon of Gomrath as G-753 in 1968. Tolkien is mentioned twice on the back cover copy.
4.I haven't been able to verify this, but my memory of the old Ace paperback of Herbert's Dune -- N-3 from 1965 -- is that the back cover alluded to Tolkien and/or The Lord of the Rings.
Dale Nelson
Paperback Library's edition (1968) of L. Sprague de Camp's Tritonian Ring promised "Thrilling sword and sorcery for the fans of Tolkien's 'Lord of the Rings.'"
ReplyDeleteI wonder if this blurb and the Conan one were written with nudges (or copy?) from de Camp. Sword-and-sorcery is really different from Tolkienian fantasy, but I don't know that de Camp quite got that. The cover art on both books, with the exploitative nudes and brutish body-builder warriors, doesn't evoke Middle-earth. But from my memory of some of de Camp's writing (e.g. in Literary Swordsmen and Sorcerers), I think de Camp may have thought the fiction in question was all basically just escapist adventure fantasy set in time-lost realms, with strange names, battles, monsters, etc. People generally weren't fooled. I've been looking at early issues of Mythprint and Mythlore, and the contributors seem right from the start to have avoided pulp.
Dale Nelson
Ballantine issued its paperback of E. R. Eddison's Mistress of Mistresses in August 1967, with back cover copy: "The second volume in the fantasy classic most often compared with J. R. R. Tolkien."
ReplyDeleteNancy Martsch pointed out to me that Ballantine's July 1969 issue of Morris's "Wood Beyond the World" has this on the back cover:
ReplyDelete----William Morris has been described as "obviously a Nineteenth Century Tolkien"---
A friend confirms that his Ace paperback of Herbert's DUNE has this endorsement from Arthur C. Clarke:
ReplyDelete"Dune seems to me unique among modern novels in the depth of its
characterization and the extraordinary detail of the world it creates.
I know nothing comparable to it except The Lord of the Rings."
However, his edition lacks the N-3 numbering of the earliest Ace edition(s). I would guess that the Clarke text goes back to the first printing, but I couldn't say for sure that it does.
One more! The Lancer paperback of Pratt's The Well of the Unicorn, dated as 1968 by Lin Carter in his Tolkien: A Look Behind The Lord of the Rings. Lancer cover copy: "An epic of other-world adventure in the tradition of J. R. R. Tolkien."
ReplyDeleteThis isn't an earliest example, but it may be in the running for the weirdest. The publisher's blurb for "Parsival" by Richard Monaco (Macmillan, 1977) described it as comparable to "The Lord of the Rings, Siddhartha, or Watership Down," which I expect were the first three fantasy novels the blurb-writer could think of.
ReplyDeleteI have a paperback novel by Edison Marshall entitled The Lost Land. The blurb on the cover, which shows a prehistoric valley in the Antarctic (true to the setting of the novel), reads "A Thrilling journey to a world beyond Middle Earth and Narnia". The only copyright says 1966 by the Chilton Book Company, but the imprint is Curtis Books and it is # 502-07227 (75 cents). The cover artist's name is in a distinct script but was partially and severely cut off, so that one can only just see the letters "arao". However, a comparison to several Ballantine Adult Fantasy covers show that the artist was Gervasio Gallardo, and that what had looked like the second "a" was in fact a "d" with the top stem cut off.
ReplyDelete